With two stories in the past two days of sarcastic ‘“tweets” being taken seriously and landing the account-holders in various forms of trouble, it’s time to raise the alarm: Be careful what you tweet.
In the first case, originally reported Monday by UK newspaper The Sun, 26 year-old Irish bartender Leigh Van Bryan was blocked from entering the United States for a trip due to tweets he had posted in the weeks before embarking reading “Free this week, for quick gossip/prep before I go and destroy America,” and “3 weeks today, we’re totally in LA pissing people off on Hollywood Blvd and diggin’ Marilyn Monroe up!”
“Destroy,” is common UK slang for partying and the “diggin’ Marilyn Monroe up” tweet was a quote from Family Guy, according to The Sun.
Bryan told the Sun that he and his travel companion Emily Bunting were intercepted by U.S. Department of Homeland Security agents at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) upon arrival and refused entry to the U.S.
The DHS agents reportedly questioned Bryan and Bunting for five hours, handcuffed them, placed them in a van “with illegal immigrants” and “locked [them] up overnight,” before sending them back to the UK. Bryan told The Sun, “they were treated like terrorists,” as the paper paraphrased him.
On Tuesday, British travel industry group Abta issued a warning about the incident to the BBC.
As the BBC reported:
“Posting statements in a public forum which could be construed as threatening - in this case saying they are going to “destroy” somewhere - will not be viewed sympathetically by US authorities,” [Abta] told the BBC.“In the past we have seen holidaymakers stopped at airport security for ‘joking’ that they have a bomb in their bag, thoroughly questioned and ending up missing their flights, demonstrating that airport security staff do not have a sense of humour when it comes to potential risk.”
Meanwhile, Gawker on Tuesday reported of an entirely separate tweet that led its author, a California police officer, into trouble — this time with the hacker group Anonymous.
As Gawker reported:
Richmond Police Department Sgt. Mike Rood became a target after he offered his support on Twitter to UFC President Dana White, who has been engaged in an entertaining feud with Anonymous over his vocal anti-piracy stance.
The escalating conflict between people under the hacker banner Anonymous and the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) was sparked by the takedown of the UFC website on January 22 by hackers unaffiliated with Anonymous in retaliation for the UFC’s support for the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). White has responded by bashing Anonymous on Twitter and in video interviews, and Anonymous returned fire by hacking and posting White’s personal contact information online.
Meanwhile, Rood, whose Twitter account name was “@Fan1UFC,” tweeted several times at Dana White on January 26, slamming Anonymous and encouraging White’s crusade against Anonymous hackers. One of Rood’s tweets read: “Get those hacking f***ers. I’m a copy in the bay area CA. I would go at them with both guns!”
In retaliation, Anonymous hacked and “doxed” Rood, that is — obtained and dumped his personal information online —- posting screenshots of his tweets as well as actual photos of his car (license plate: Fan1UFC) and badge. The Anonymous users encouraged their followers on Twitter to complain on the Richmond Police Department Facebook page that one of the agency’s officers was threatening to shoot people on Twitter.
In response, the Richmond Police Department is opening an investigation into Rood, according to The Mercury News.
As the paper reported:
Richmond police Capt. Mark Gagan would not confirm the identity of the officer, citing state privacy protections, or discuss particulars of the case. He said the department received a flood of complaints beginning Monday evening.“We are well aware of the response people have had to the situation,” Gagan said. “We are opening an investigation, and we will get to the bottom of it. If there were policy violations, we will deal with it appropriately.”
Meanwhile, the Richmond Police Department disabled commenting on its Facebook page, The Next Web reported.
The incidents come, coincidentally enough, at a time when Twitter itself is undergoing renewed scrutiny due to its announcement that it will begin selectively “withholding” tweets on a country-by-country basis when legally compelled to by local government authorities. But based on the above incidents, it seems as though withheld tweets are among the least threatening things Twitter users have to worry about these days.
Carl Franzen
Carl Franzen is TPM Idea Lab's tech reporter. He used to work for The Daily, AOL and The Atlantic Wire (though not simultaneously, thankfully). He's never met a button that didn't need to be pressed. He can be reached at carl@talkingpointsmemo.com.
I wish people would stop saying that Anonymous did stuff to "retaliate" for this or that action. "Retaliate" implies that Anonymous has suffered some particularized injury entitling it to respond. Instead, its members, or whatever they call themselves, are engaging in plain old unadulterated vigilantism, meting out punishment to those it deems worthy of punishment.
which is why i've long advocated for a special font used specifically to denote sarcasm. you'd figure somebody would have come up with one by now...
freaktown Comic Sans?
So Terrorists are now using Twitter and Facebook to plan and coordinate with each other?
Dave Adams Yep. Just ask Hosni Mubarak.
Stupidscript
So thousands of protestors standing in a public square protesting are equivalent to people who plant bombs and fly airplanes into buildings?
Dave Adams Oh ... you were asking why some people are classified as "terrorists" and others are classified as "freedom fighters"? You'll need to work on your question-asking skills ... it seemed like you were asking about Twitter use in coordinated events. I suggest you ask Hosni Mubarak whether "terrorists" used Twitter to overthrow him in his own country. Then ask those who were involved with his overthrow, and see if they call themselves "terrorist". I'm pretty sure you will discover that a label is defined by them what use it ... not by the target of that label.
I learned this in my own way. Thank God it wasn't against Anonymous but a fitness-tracking website with whom I had a 3-year paid membership. One of their features was broken and I complained via Twitter. After an exchange or two, my membership was cancelled (my fee was refunded) and was ignominiously tossed out. Had I handled it via e-mail, I doubt that would have happened.Very true: be careful what you tweet!
If you have nothing to hide (just expressing your 1st Amendment Right), you are not a threat to our citizens or you just want to be a "cheese-head", then TWIT.......if not, get the hell out of here.
The FBI, CIA and NSA are obligated to protect this nation...they are NOT asking you not to Twit. So, folks, quit the unnecessary whining.
Now don't nobody go getting ideas of writing really nice fluffy things with certain words in caps that spell out a different message....
The message is clear: don't f**k with Anonymous.
I don't care, as long as my penis is free to express itself on chatroulette.
imfabulous13
Wow, a talking penis! You gotta market that thing and make the talk shoe circuit. Puppetry of te penis hasn't got anything on you.
The thing I find most disturbing is that the government is monitoring Twitter and Facebook so thoroughly. I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise, but it's still disturbing. Also that Anonymous could so easily find the guy's computer in order to hack it. Makes me wonder how often the government is secretly hacking computers. As if all the trojans I picked up earlier this year hadn't made me paranoid enough already.
debbiedonothing Search algorithms are well known for their sense of irony.
debbiedonothing Remember that the Total Information Awareness program never really went away. The Information Awareness Office may have been defunded, but a number of its projects continue to run under different names.
Anonymous attacked Dana White for having an OPINION? Wow. Just wow.
hrebendorf Anonymous are crusaders for free speech- unless that speech is critical of Anonymous.
Flying Squidhrebendorf Sounds rather like the Republicans -- free speech is fine, but only our kind of "free speech." Anonymous crusades to raise hell, whatever message they might be pushing is lost by their methods.
imkmuFlying Squidhrebendorf Ooh, you guys are gonna get hacked. ;)
Flying Squidhrebendorf Yup. Self-righteous Defenders of the Peepul tend not to handle it well when they get the slightest crumb of power of some kind.
Both FB and Twitter are evil. Stay away if you value your privacy and freedom.
shoes4industry i keep telling Think Progress that, but they still require a FB account in order to comment. So I don't comment there.
fessinbootsshoes4industry Can I just say how much I freaking HATE that policy so many websites have? It's almost becoming like the whole damned world revolves around stupid FB.
nowhereman fessinboots shoes4industry There's nothing wrong with Facebook. No really. And yes that's my real name and picture.
But seriously, I'd only used this FB avatar on TPM and it drew email spam from liberal activists. But at least they've all stopped when I "unsubscribed" to something I never subscribed to.
The level of stupidity in bureaucracies never ceases to amaze me. Detaining and deporting foreign tourists who clearly posed no threat (after they were questioned) suggests a low average to below average intellectual capacity. In addition, I'm certain that the Homeland security bozos had no knowledge of or interest in investigating the patois of the Irish bartender. good lord, what would have happened to him if he had tweeted that he was bringing his own "fags" for fear that he couldn't find them here in the states. DHS = professional wankers.
On the other hand, "going at em with both guns (both barrels blazing)" is clearly a bastardized idiom and certainly doesn't suggest that officer douchebag was going to shoot citizens in the Bay area. C'mon folks are we really that dumb (and it scares the sh_t out of me if we are)?
williwaws No kidding. People like these airport dipsh*ts make me embarassed for this country.
williwaws Agree on the idiot officer on the technical points; however, I'd be concerned if he were policing my community as I'm pretty sure justice isn't blind in his eyes.
fessinbootswilliwaws It's a free country and I suppose anyone can like watching the blood sport that is MMA, but really, if you are "following" Dana White, I don't really trust your judgment to police my community.
williwaws There's a rather obvious, if banal, bureaucratic imperative at work here. No one ever got fired by DHS for being too careful about who they let in to the country. And this one time, some people weren't careful enough and a really, really bad thing happened.
Ugg don't tweet. Ugg twuggs.
Mental note: DHS does not watch Family Guy and is apparently unaware that people use different words for things across the pond.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like